Energy Medicine at RMIT

by: Mal Vickers

Energy Medicine’: What is it? And should Australian Universities teach it?

energy medicine

There is a fascinating array of courses available at universities. Like me, do you look for interesting courses that might give you the edge in the jobs market or lead to an exciting new career?

Recently, I learnt that RMIT University offered a course in a relatively new branch of medicine, Energy Medicine.

The ways humanity have explored and improved human health seem endless. There’s pathology, psychology, dentistry, physiotherapy and nuclear medicine to name just a few. Should energy medicine be amongst those?

This new branch of medicine offers hope for naturally improving human health at little or no cost; but is it really effective?

RMIT and Energy Medicine

RMIT University are still advertising Energy Medicine both as a stand-alone subject in which anyone can enrol, and as an elective of the larger ‘Master of Wellness program.

The Master of Wellness program is administered by the Health Science faculty at RMIT.

Masters of Wellness

RMIT’s website indicates that Master of Wellness is a one and a half year, full time program. RMIT’s promotion of the course states:

Work opportunities include the spa and wellness industry, the complementary healthcare sector, conventional healthcare and community health settings, the corporate sector and private practice as a wellness consultant.

It’s interesting that RMIT are offering courses designed for people to master of wellnessenter the ‘the complementary healthcare sector’ and from within its ‘Health Science’ faculty. This sector suffers from an association with pseudoscience and a lack of evidence (‘quackery’ in less polite terms). Surely, this is now a thing of the past?

The online information about the ‘Masters of Wellness’ program can be found here.  Click on the down arrow next to the word ‘features’ to view the individual courses in the program:

Aromatherapy for wellness

 Food as medicine

Herbs and natural supplements

Mind-body wellness

The inclusion of the Spa and Hospitality Management Certificate also confirms that the wellness program is about graduates finding real work in this sector, perhaps even setting up a business for themselves.

RMIT Open DayMaster of Wellness build 202

I attended RMIT’s Open Day this year, hoping to verify the information shown on RMIT’s webpage about the wellness program. It wasn’t very easy to find information about the program. There were no seminars to promote it on Open Day, unlike many other courses. However, I found that there were brochures advertising the Masters of Wellness program available for potential students to take from Building 202.

I had to indulge in a little investigative journalism to find out more about the Wellness program and the inclusion of Energy Medicine within the program – more on this topic later.

Energy Medicine Evidence Base

The use of the term ‘energy’ in the context of alternative medicine immediately raises red flags with me. From my experiences with alternative medicine practitioners, the word ‘energy’ must be the most misused word in the alternative medicine lexicon. Whereas ‘energy’ is Energy medicine at RMITdefined quite precisely when used within the physical sciences, that’s not so within alternative medicine circles. It means anything you’d like it to mean.

RMIT last ran the Energy Medicine course in 2010. The course coordinator, Mark Abadi is resident to the UK. Thus, the coursework for energy medicine is entirely online.

The advertising for the course, in places, says the right things to a (possibly) skeptical reader.

‘…diagnostic and therapeutic models and applications, and the scope of its current research and evidence base.

That’s where I’d now like to focus my attention. What is this ‘evidence-base’?

The subject is described in glowing terms:

Energy Medicine is on the frontiers of science and technology where ancient and modern knowledge intersect.

It sounds fascinating.

‘To explore ‘Energy Medicine’ one must utilise scientific exploration carried out across a multifaceted scientific bandwidth including detailed work from the fields of Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Psychology and Physics and Quantum Physics.

Seriously? Quantum Physics is now part of a course that comes under RMIT’s ‘Health Science’ faculty? Time to once again drag out the skeptical mantra:extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’.

I had a lot of trouble trying to make sense of this sentence:

‘Patterns of effect are so fundamentally entwined with the mathematics of creation and consciousness that at the deepest level, they seem to operate under hence unknown principles governing quantum mechanics and non local Universe principles.’

Non local Universe principles’? Unknown principals? Surely those principals remain unknown? *head spins* It reads a lot like science sounding word salad to me.

Perhaps RMIT are not serious about this; maybe there’s a little academic leg pulling going on? This idea was quickly dispelled after some online searching. Here’s an example of an Energy Medicine clinic operating in Melbourne. The practitioner claims to have obtained his qualifications at RMIT.

There is one helpful aspect to investigating the course; it is conducted over the internet, therefore quite a lot of the course material can be found via internet searches. For example, Mark Adadi has a YouTube video (here) that appears to be the welcoming message for new students. [update – sorry this video has been changed, it now requires a password to view]

I did a quick check of Mark Abadi’s credentials.

He claims to be a:

Holistic Psychologist… Life Coach… Therapist and Author working with health and wellbeing… teaches advanced meditation… Applying research techniques he dove into the study of complementary holistic therapy techniques, including reflexology, nutrition, aromatherapy and deep tissue massage… researching the interactive nature of the body’s energy systems. He is an expert in the interaction of the mind, body matrix…

Mark A bio and RMIT

I found another YouTube clip by Mark Abadi, titled: ‘The Scientific Basis of Energy Medicine, it sounds exactly like the information I’m looking for.

In this clip, Mark states:

We’ll go through about the scientific basis of energy medicine, so it’s based on a book by a guy named James Oschman”.

Indeed James Oschman does have a book (published in 2000) called ‘Energy Medicine‘. The book was kind of pricey ($50+) so I decided to look elsewhere for freely available scientific evidence. My reasoning was that if there is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of energy medicine, it should be available in the medical research literature. PubMed is probably the best place to look, having some 23 million (current and approximate) references and abstracts of peer-reviewed medical studies and research. If there are randomised placebo conducted trials by James Oschman that show the effectiveness of energy medicine, PubMed should show me the abstracts. I couldn’t find any, however.

Taking a step back, there’s some basic information about energy medicine on Wikipedia. I know that Wikipedia can sometimes be inaccurate, however, I’ll use it to understand the basics and I’ll check the references for anything important. The current page declares: Energy medicine –

“… holds the belief that a healer can channel healing energy into the person seeking help by different methods: hands-on, hands-off, and distant (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations.”

Seriously? People can treat other people’s ailments just by believing in ‘energy’ and perhaps a ritual involving the hands? No need for injections, pathology tests, kidney transplants MRI’s etc, etc? It sounds quite extraordinary.

Healing Session

What exactly what goes on during an energy medicine healing session, I wondered? Are people taking this seriously? This You-Tube video that claims to show how to heal insomnia with energy medicine is worth a look. I found I liked the video more with the commentary off.

Firstly, you mime picking up a medicine ball, then you mime throwing it down again, then you sort of massage your forehead and wipe away imaginary sweat from your hair, then you do a neck massage and ear massage. Oh, I almost forgot to mention, it’s important that you don’t forget to breathe whilst doing this.

To be fair, RMIT isn’t in any way associated with this video; the link is an example of Energy Medicine in action. There are many other videos about energy medicine on YouTube of similar standard. Now that you appreciate what goes on at a typical Energy Medicine healing session, I’ll return to discussing Energy Medicine at RMIT.

More Research into Energy Medicine

Regardless of how Energy Medicine may or may not work, modern science has well established methods for sorting the wheat from the chaff – objectively measure the actual health outcomes in people a controlled way. Rigorously conducted clinical trials and epidemiological studies objectively show us the way forward. There’s no reason why Energy Medicine can’t be subjected to rigorous testing and those trials then subjected to critical review.

Professor Edzard Ernst of Exeter University is a leading authority on complementary medicine. He conducted a second systematic review of Energy Medicine research in 2003 and concluded:

Since the publication of our previous systematic review in 2000, several rigorous new studies have emerged. Collectively they shift the weight of the evidence against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo.”

The Wikipedia page for Energy Medicine also notes possible ‘alternative’ (i.e. skeptical) explanations for this branch of alternative medicine that might explain the early positive results – such as the placebo effect and cognitative dissonance.

Many health interventions can look plausible and natural, yet there is always a cost to the patient. It might be just a small loss of money. However, some studies have shown that the use of alternative therapies in the treatment or management of cancer means dying sooner. Why should health consumers expect anything less than a high probability of evidence that shows unambiguously that a particular treatment is effective? Despite looking, I’m yet to find that evidence for energy medicine.

It’s the age-old skeptical problem of trying to prove a negative. I can’t say definitively that Energy Medicine doesn’t work anymore than I can say definitively that all reindeer can’t fly – I’m yet to find evidence of it, is all I can reasonably say. (Any young people reading this, please avert your eyes) There are stories that reindeer can fly – but it seems implausible.

It’s up to the promoters of Energy Medicine to put forward definitive evidence that it is real. The burden of proof is with the promoters.

Questions for RMIT

Should RMIT University be teaching a ‘medical’ subject that seems implausible and without substantive supporting evidence?

I emailed RMIT University’s communications department to ask the following:

‘My questions are in relation to RMIT’s ‘Masters of Wellness’ program and the ‘Energy Medicine’ short course.

Please note, that these questions are guided by the RMIT Act. The questions may be of a critical nature; however, as critical enquiry is stated in your Act, I anticipate a welcome response to the nature of my queries. The Objects Section of RMIT’s Act states (in part):
–          promoting critical and free enquiry…
–          undertake scholarship, pure and applied research…
–          the advancement of knowledge…

[‘Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Act 2010’]

I’m particularly interested in the Energy Medicine course from a scholarship and applied research point of view.

1.  What is your position on the claims made on the RMIT webpage for the ‘Energy Medicine’ module? This page says, (in part):

To explore ‘Energy Medicine’ one must utilise scientific exploration carried out across a multifaceted scientific bandwidth including detailed work from the fields of Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Psychology and Physics and Quantum Physics.

In particular, would you refer to the science that details the links between this form of medicine and quantum physics? Unfortunately, my own research on seeking evidence in the efficacy of energy medicine was inconclusive.

2.  I note that RMIT’s webpage for the Energy Medicine short course was edited around August 2013 and Mr Mark Abadi’s name was removed as the course coordinator. Would you please update me with the information as to who will conduct this course again in 2014? (RMIT Energy Medicine course information)

I understand that one of the intended employment prospects for students who graduate from the Masters of Wellness program is the complementary healthcare sector. (RMIT Masters of Wellness program information)

3.  Would you be able to direct me to some references in scientific, peer-reviewed, medical literature in relation to energy medicine? I’m particularly interested in understanding the latest clinical trial data on energy medicine. The information from such clinical trials would be significant evidence that might support the use of energy medicine by RMIT’s graduates working in the complementary healthcare sector.

4.  Looking at the bigger picture, how do you see the Energy Medicine course from the position of a university that claims to actively pursue research and scholarship?

This was the initial response from RMIT.

‘RMIT has not offered the Energy Medicine course for more than two years.’

I wrote back explaining that I had information indicating that RMIT may run the Energy Medicine course again. The reply from RMIT was:

If you can find a link, please send it to me. The course isn’t being offered.

Does RMIT ‘offer’ energy medicine?

Although I didn’t ask whether the course was being ‘offered’, that seems to be the reason RMIT are not willing to address further questions. Here’s why I think it is worth asking those questions and why I associate RMIT with energy medicine.

–          RMIT currently has a public webpage that mentions the energy medicine course.

It’s true, the page currently says: ‘This course currently does not have any upcoming dates.’

–          Finding information about the energy medicine course during open day 2013 wasn’t easy. It appears that RMIT aren’t heavily promoting the course.

–          The course coordinator in 2010, Mark Abadi, says that the energy medicine course is part of RMIT’s Masters of Wellness program.

–          RMIT Health Sciences Faculty was approached as a prospective student would (the investigative journalism part). The information I received indicated that RMIT offered energy medicine as an elective subject for the upcoming, extended ‘Masters of Wellness’ program.

It’s not something I can definitively say from the research I have, however it appears to me that RMIT may run the Energy Medicine course again if there was enough demand from students wanting to do the course and enough of the students doing the Wellness program ‘elected’ to do it. I don’t know if that demand is there, possibly not.

–          I notice that the information from RMIT’s communications department didn’t say – we will never run this course again. Why have a webpage for the course and keep it updated if there is no intention to ever run it?

–          RMIT agree that the energy medicine course last ran in 2010.

Perhaps my correspondence with RMIT was now degenerating to one of semantics. How do you define a course that is advertised but not ‘offered’?

I again wrote to RMIT asking if they would kindly answer the questions I had asked more than a month before. This was the reply:

I replied to your correspondence last month. Nothing has changed in the University’s position since then.


Time to re-cap. It appears that RMIT taught a pseudoscientific course (perhaps a ‘pseudomedicine’ course might be a better term) under the faculty of ‘Health Science’ in 2010.

There’s a possibility I may be misjudging RMIT; perhaps training people in Energy Medicine is something that can be justified with scientific evidence. However, RMIT were using common pseudo-scientific /alternative medicine terms in their advertising material i.e. ‘multifaceted scientific bandwidth’ and ‘quantum physics’.

I asked for some evidence in the peer-reviewed medical literature that Energy Medicine is a subject worthy of being taught at a scholarly university.

I thought the questions I put to RMIT might be of public interest. However, RMIT said they don’t offer the course.

Why should you be concerned? Energy Medicine can be harmful to patients needing effective healthcare. Even if you have no intention of visiting an RMIT trained complementary health care provider for your ailments, you’re still subsidising the university system through your taxes.

If Energy Medicine actually turns out to be an effective form of medicine I’ll eat my hat – Oh… is it OK if I eat my hat at a distance, by just thinking about it?

14 Responses to Energy Medicine at RMIT

  1. Whether or not “energy medicine” or any other form of woo woo is shown to cause individual harm, there is only one way for any self respecting institution to teach a pack of lies. That is, in the study of the history of lying. Unfortunately it appears they were liars themselves and have not ruled out lying to students again in the future. Excellent exposé and I’d like to see this reach the Ministry of Education. Nothing motivates universities to reform their practices like threats to their public funding.

  2. Lesa Rusher says:

    Have you ever had an energy healing session? I really don’t like this article.

    • Frank Collins says:

      What difference would having “an energy healing session” make to any critical analysis of its efficacy? Energy healing is, and always has been, complete nonsense, as clearly demonstrated by all credible research. You may be particularly prone to wishful thinking and the placebo effect; that does not, however, show that energy healing is anything other than quackery.

      You didn’t like the article? Why not? Does the concept of logic and objective enquiry cause you discomfort?

  3. martin says:

    What about all the funding scientists get to poioson humans- and the planet- and cancer patients, whom they don’t cure, that’s totally scientific I suppose,

    • Frank Collins says:

      Yep, as a matter of fact, it is. Are you suggesting that chemotherapy and radiation treatment don’t cure cancers and allow people to lengthen their lives?

      When you have a tiny shred of evidence for this sweeping assertion, please post back? You will revolutionalise medicine and make yourself famous (but we both know this won’t happen).

  4. Jose says:

    I strongly recommend you look into the Domancic method. This has been popular in Europe for the past 30 years with arguably solid results. If you think Energy Medicine is quackery, perhaps you are not yet open to greater possibilities at this point in time. Not your fault, perhaps in time, in this lifetime or the next lifetimes.

    • keng2 says:

      Thank you Jose.

      This is the first link I encountered when looking into the Domancic method.
      If you have links to the clinical trials that would comprise the “arguably solid results” , please post them.

    • Frank Collins says:

      “popular in Europe for the past 30 years”
      Argument from Popularity. Hitler was popular in Europe a few years ago and that didn’t end well either.

      “with arguably solid results”
      Solid results at what? Emptying the pockets of gullible people perhaps, but that is all it has achieved.

      • Johanna Skelding says:

        We do not know how homoeopathy works, however, let us assume that it is/may be a form of energy medicine. You are free to think that it is nonsense.
        Find a homoeopath and do what is called a proving.
        Additionally I believe that only 20-30% of what is done in the usual medicine is evidence based.

      • Frank Collins says:

        As a naturopathy, you have a vested interest in this nonsense and fleece gullible people of their hard-earned.

        Homoeopathy has not ever worked. It is a placebo and any ‘results’ are based on regression to the mean, the natural passage of an illness, a self-limiting condition, or any combination of these.

        I suggest you learn what Avocado’s number is, so you might, just might, see why it is totally implausible. Any claims you might make are in fairytale land.

        Your last assertion is total bs and up to the usual standard of logic displayed by witchdoctors, like you.

  5. T.T says:

    Galileo, umm we all know that western medicine is good for acute life threatening situations. It is not good for chronic. I know many people who have died of cancer after 6 months of chemo. Many many many. I know many people who have cured themselves of disease through herbs (which are chemicals actually) and thought, etc. Sceptics are just like the people who didn’t believe Galileo. There is big money in pharma and we all know it. I wish every skeptic would get a chronic illness that western medicine makes worse and then finds a cure with herbs and lifestyle.

    • trish says:

      I agree with you TT. I had a chronic illness for years in the early 2000’s I went to the best specialists all over Melbourne (neurologists, ENT’s GP’s). None could do anything. It wasn’t until I took herbs from an Ayurvedic Dr, had some energy medicine etc, that I got better. It astounds me that skeptics can be so narrow minded. My partner who has a phd in science and works in science is totally sold on herbs etc after a chronic illness that western medicine only offered countless rounds of antibiotics for. Of course Western medicine is great for acute and it has also helped my family. Really over the arrogance of Western Drs and their approach to some chronic disease. I agree, if every skeptic had a chronic illness that western medicine couldn’t solve…..

      • malvickers says:

        Hi Trish, thanks for the comment. Ayurvedic is yet another form of alternative medicine, there are many, it is not the same as energy medicine. It’s disappointing that you categories ‘skeptics’ as narrow minded, perhaps you confuse cynics with skeptics. If you look into the skeptical thinking a little more deeply, you’ll find that it is possible to get a skeptic to admit they where wrong and to change their position. What’s required is good quality scientific evidence.Which unfortunately no one has managed to put forward in the six years since this was posted.

    • malvickers says:

      Hello TT. Galileo had scientific evidence on his side, energy medicine does not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: