A Skeptic’s Guide to The Scientific Method

This article first appeared as a Vic Skeptics discussion pamphlet. After our recent experiences with Power Balance, Optiderma Skin products, Negative Ion Balance  Jewellery and SensaSlim, it seemed like a timely moment to bring The Scientific Method  front-and-centre. This procedure has been standard now for about two hundred years. That’s why it’s appropriate to have a jaundiced view of anyone claiming remarkable scientific breakthroughs which are not supported by published data. The full range of our discussion pamphlets can be downloaded here:  http://www.skeptics.com.au/resources/educational/  or by clicking on the “Useful Info” link at the top of this page.

“Science is best defined as a careful, disciplined, logical search for knowledge about any and all aspects of the universe, obtained by examination of the best available evidence and always subject to correction and improvement upon discovery of better evidence. What’s left is magic.

And it doesn’t work.”

– James Randi

The term “Scientific Method” is used to describe the way scientific research is designed, performed and reviewed. Good science depends on rigour – strict and unfailing adherence to basic principles.

In simple terms, as a scientist,  you would:

1. Make some observation about something that is going on in the universe.

2. Form a hypothesis, (tentative explanation) that is consistent with what you have observed.

3. Make predictions based on your hypothesis. In other words, if your explanation is right, then certain things should happen under controlled circumstances.

4. Test those predictions by careful experiments or further observations and modify the hypothesis in the light of your results. Be prepared to “fine tune”, alter or abandon your hypothesis in the light of these observations.

5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until your hypothesis and observations consistently tally. As a rigorously tested explanation of your observations, your hypothesis is now entitled to be called a theory.

Once that has happened, you would publish your theory, as a “paper” in one of the scientific journals. You share your discovery with other scientists around the world.

What comes then is a process called “Peer Review”. You can expect your theory to be examined minutely. Your fellow scientists will try to repeat your experiments. That is tremendously important, because sometimes a researcher will have a preconceived belief that is so strong that consciously or unconsciously, they choose results selectively to support that point of view. Even if your theory survives this close scrutiny, it may still be discarded in time as better data becomes available.

Other belief systems exist which are not supported by the process of Scientific Method. Some of these are religious in nature. Others, like astrology, homeopathy, iridology, telepathy and telekinesis can only be designated with the general term pseudoscience.

Some differences between science and pseudoscience

(click to enlarge)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: