The ACCC Moves on Power Balance

After the TGA Complaints Panel ruled on Power Balance bracelets last month, the promoters of Power Balance were asked to put up this disclaimer on their web sites.  To no one’s surprise, they didn’t.

Now stepping in to take on Power Balance is a regulatory body with a little more grunt, the ACCC. Unlike the TGA, the ACCC can force business to act responsibly if they won’t do it voluntarily.

Power Balance Australia has given the ACCC a number of undertakings that include:

– not make any further claims to the effect that the products will improve the user’s balance, strength and flexibility.

– not, in conjunction with the products, make claims that “Power Balance is Performance Technology” or use the phrase “Performance Technology”.

– not make claims that Power Balance products are “designed to work with the body’s natural energy field”.

The company has 14 days to comply

– unless Power Balance Australia has obtained a written report from an independent testing body that has tested the products pursuant to a properly–designed randomised, double blind, scientific study or clinical trial and that the report provides a statistically significant basis for making any of the claims.

The undertakings document then goes on to have Power Balance Australia publish, at its expense, a corrective advertisement in many newspapers and magazines. The full ACCC Power Balance undertakings can be found on the ACCC’s web site here.

I particularly like the mention of double blind, randomised trials.  Skeptics have been banging on for many years that these kinds of trials are essential for proper product testing.  It’s important to take the possibility of the human propensity to fool oneself out of the testing method.

And wouldn’t it be nice if this was done before products went to market?

The following corrective advertisement will now be published in newspapers and magazines.

click - full size

The list of publications that have previously published advertisements for Power Balance and will now carry the corrective advertisements is interesting.  These include the:

Australian Yoga Journal

Australian Golf Digest

Men’s Fitness



Australian Natural Health

If you happen to have purchased a Power Balance bracelet in the last six months, and you’re somewhat embarrassed by the fact, never fear:

Power Balance Australia undertake to: offer for a period of six months from the date of commencement of this Undertaking, to refund, upon return of a genuine Product, the whole of the purchase price together with postage, upon proof of purchase (which will include a credit card record or store barcode) from an authorised reseller in Australia.

I must admit I’m getting a little tired of doing Power Balance posts.  Surely it’s the end of the idea that a magic wrist bands can somehow improve your health?  Surely it shouldn’t be up to Skeptics to point out that these things don’t work and are marketed using simple tricks?  It’s rather sad that so many people where taken in. As much as we’d rather not say, it’s sadly indicative of a poor understanding of science in the Australian community.

I think it’s also time for all those celebrity promoters of Power Balance to say sorry to fans, regardless of the fact that they themselves might have been taken in.  My guess is, that instead of being leaders, they will simply, quietly, stop wearing a Power Balance bracelet and say nothing.

Below are links to previous posts about Power Balance and magic wrist bands published by the Vic Skeptics.  I sincerely hope that the above post on this topic, is the last.  Not because we’re now going to stop pointing out humbug when we see it, but because we want to see an end to products like this that are nothing but a cheap expensive con.


TGA calls on Power Balance to withdraw claims and advertising

Shonky Award for Power Balance

Power Balance … or Placebo?

Video fest: the Power Balance wrist band and the arm press

4 Responses to The ACCC Moves on Power Balance

  1. Terry Kelly says:

    Good point about it not being up to the skeptics to point these things out. The public is not getting the information it needs in the first place. But the public isn’t well educated, generally, about science in the first place. I reckon lots of literate and numerate, even University educated people, wouldn’t even know what a randomised double blind trial is. Anyway, at least the skeptics had a go and there seems to be a result. And great work by Ken Harvey.

  2. Robert Webb says:

    What does this mean for the many other power band companies? The pharmacy across the road from me sells Eken Power Bands for about $70. Shouldn’t the ACCC take this action across the board for all such companies? I understand there are about 8 such companies?

  3. Stephen Ridgway says:

    Thank goodness these bits of witchcraft are being exposed, let’s ban the lot!

  4. paul conroy says:

    I’ve spoken to people who sell them, and they are still happy. They’ve made thousands of dollars and they only have to refund if the person sends the band back with a RECEIPT… (who ever keeps those things)..
    So, Despite this win, they won also..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: